Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
An autism diagnosis is a description of a neurotype, not a description of how that neurotype is sitting at a particular point in a person's life. Over years, the picture changes. A career change, a relationship change, a health event, a long period of high masking, a long period of accommodation, a long period of neither — each of these can move the underlying functional capacity even when the underlying neurotype has not changed.
An NDIS review, a workplace accommodation request, or an educational application asks for current functional capacity. A diagnostic report from years ago is often no longer the document those processes need. The reassessment is the document that they do need.
The work is not to re-litigate the original diagnosis. It is to read where the picture is sitting now, against the same domains the NDIS uses, and to produce a clinical report that documents the current capacity, support needs, and the changes since the original diagnosis.
This service is for adults with an existing autism diagnosis whose documentation no longer reflects their current picture — typically for NDIS plan reviews, funding-level changes, accommodation requests, or other support contexts that require current functional capacity evidence.
Targeted digital questionnaires capture changes since the original diagnosis: current daily challenges, evolving sensory needs, shifts in masking capacity, new environmental demands, and the specific domains the NDIS assesses against.
A 60–90 minute interview with the psychologist works through current functional capacity across the NDIS domains — communication, social interaction, learning, mobility, self-care, self-management. The aim is concrete examples of how support needs are sitting now, not a generic summary.
The psychologist reads the current picture against the original diagnostic data. Where capacity has shifted, the analysis names where and why. Where the original assessment under-described the picture (often the case for high-masking presentations diagnosed in adulthood), that is named too.
The original diagnostic report is reviewed alongside the current findings. The reassessment is built to complement the original, not to replace it — the diagnosis itself does not change, but the functional documentation does.
The report is structured for the support system that needs it. Where the report is for the NDIS, it uses the language and structure of the NDIS assessment process. Where it is for another purpose, the structure follows that purpose. The reasoning is documented, not just the conclusions.
A dedicated session to work through the report. The aim is that the person leaves with a clear understanding of what the report says and how to use it — for the NDIS conversation, for the workplace conversation, for the accommodation conversation.
When the reassessment is the right step, the outcome is a current document that the support system can actually act on. The original diagnosis remains the original diagnosis. What has changed is the documentation of how that diagnosis is sitting in the person's life now, and what support that picture requires.
Where support needs have increased, the report makes that case in language the funding system uses. Where they have shifted in shape — different domains needing more or less — the report describes the shift specifically. Where they have decreased, the report says that too; the aim is accuracy.
The reassessment is not the support itself. It is the document the rest of the support work — both inside and outside biio. — needs in order to proceed.